Sometimes the “bad” option isn’t so bad… 🌯
So obviously getting a chicken wrap from a takeaway restaurant is always going to be more calories than making one at home and I’m certainly not suggesting a KFC or Nandos are the healthiest meal choices. But fast food is definitely something you can have now and then as part of a balanced diet if you want to.
There seems to be an underlying assumption that compared to somewhere like KFC, Nandos would provide a ‘healthier’ or ‘good’ takeaway option. Certainly their chicken wrap would generally be considered a healthy choice. It’s a grilled chicken breast, in their signature sauce, in a wrap.
In contrast the KFC Flamin’ wrap would probably be considered a ‘bad’ option. It’s deep friend in a batter, and comes with cheese as well! However the reality is it’s actually considerably fewer calories, around 200 fewer in fact! The KFC wrap is 335 cals and the Nandos one is 537 cals. Now I don’t know about you but that surprised me!
Both these restaurants have all their calories on their website so it’s very easy to check before you order. Both are perfectly good lunch or dinner options, but it just does go to show that we need to consider our preconceptions about certain foods and whether the are “bad” or “good” and remember that ultimately it’s the calories that count.
4 thoughts on “Sometimes the “bad” option isn’t so bad…”
Interesting. I would consider KFC worse than Nandos as well. Need to think twice I guess.
So would I – it’s sometimes surprising! Xx
All the more reason for people to do their research when it comes to the food that they eat. You’d be surprised just how healthier fast food items can be compared to options that are considered “healthy” once you dig into the details.
Exactly! Xx knowledge is power xx