It’s Sunday afternoon, you’re about to settle down in front of a movie with some snacks. So you grab a few biccies, packet of crisps, bag of chocolate, some sweeties and a drink. You know it’s not exactly low calorie but it doesn’t seem that bad… plus you won’t eat all the chocolate and sweets (except once that bag is open who are you kidding – they’re gone right?). This may sound like a lot but actually it’s pretty easy to stack up this sort of snacking without realising it and the calories really add up.
A few biscuits (3 Jammy dodgers at 78 cals each), a packet of hula hoops (120 cals), bag of haribo (548 cals), grab bag of giant buttons (636 cals) and a Pepsi (120 cals). That’s a whopping 1673 Cals! Of snacks!
There’s nothing wrong with enjoying some
snacks with a movie but maybe try a few swaps to reduce the cals without reducing the enjoying. You could have a bag of mini jammy dodgers (88 cals), a packet of hula pufts (72 cals), two mini haribo bags (55 cals each), two treat size bags of buttons (152 cals) and a Pepsi Max… for only 422 cals. Which not only is still quite a lot of cals for a snack but is a lot of food full stop – you’d probably find you were satisfied with all that anyway and not miss the larger bags!
Believe it or not weight loss isn’t actually about dieting – it’s about maintenance. People wrongly assume that maintenance is something you do once you’ve reached your goal weight, when in reality maintenance begins on day one of your ‘diet’
Quick fixes and fad diets are really appealing and everyone wants to feel better about themselves as quickly as possible – I get that. But what then? You start a new ‘diet’ and do it religiously for weeks or months, then the diet ends and you go right back to ‘normal’ eating again and your old behaviours and you gain the weight back.
Think about it – your ‘normal’ behaviour and eating hasn’t helped so far has it? Otherwise you wouldn’t be wanting to diet to lose weight. So a quick fix fad diet and then returning to it isn’t the answer to life long weight loss. That’s the issue with these diet clubs / shakes/ cleanses / trendy diets – none of them actually address the root cause of why you’re overweight or the behaviours and habits that have got you there.
The reality is the habits and behaviours that help you lose weight are the ones that will help you maintain it as well. You can’t expect to keep the weight off if nothing has changed. I often tell my clients they need to behave like the ‘slimmer’ / ‘fitter’ / ‘stronger’ (whatever THEIR goal is) version of themselves . What would that person do? That person probably can’t get away with 3 takeaways a week, or boozy lunches at the weekend etc. It’s about finding things you enjoy (both food and exercise) that fit into your goal lifestyle. Swapping behaviours and habits for new ones. For example – not restricting foods you enjoy, but learning to include them as part of your eating plan, trying to be as physically active as possible for you generally and doing exercise you enjoy etc
Don’t waste your money on fads and quick fixes. Instead look at how you’re approaching your fitness and diet goals and ask yourself – is this something I can maintain for the long term? Because if it isn’t, you’re going to struggle to make (and later maintain) progress.
I often talk about the marketing power of “protein” and how snacks (and other products) are often promoted or perceived as “healthy” or better because they contain X amount of protein. The reasoning behind this is the fact that increased protein can help with improved satiety (feelings of fullness) so CAN help to prevent overeating. Also those working out may want to focus on protein to help with muscle building. Unless you’re a bodybuilder or athlete you probably don’t need to go out of your way to take in extra protein as most balanced diets contain far more protein than the average person needs. However you may still wish to focus on higher protein foods and snacks to help keep you feeling full.
So you may well see these lentil chips/crisps and think it would be a good snack option – it’s something that feels like a treat (crisps) and it’s says it’s 15% protein – win win! It’s 175 cals which is actually not bad for a snack at all and contains 6g protein – also not bad.
Oh but this is awkward… the humble baked bean snack pot is a mere 158 cals and it will actually provide you with even more protein – 9.4g in fact! Aside from the fact it’s lower calorie, and has more protein, it’s also far greater volume – which also helps to keep you full. It will take longer to eat, and has a higher amount of fibre too which will aid with the feelings of fullness. You also get the bonus of added micronutrients. It is also considerably cheaper!
At this time of year all the coffee shops bring out their range of seasonal coffees and snacks. The pumpkin spice latte even has somewhat of a cult following. So if you’re out and about you may well decide to grab a quick seasonal drink and a snack to go with it.
This particular example is a large Pumpkin spice latte (with semi skimmed milk) and a pumpkin loaf. You’d probably think this was a reasonable thing to have as a snack and you might realise it’s a few hundred calories but it can’t be that bad. It’s just a coffee right? And the pumpkin loaf is basically a healthy snack right?
On the other hand if you grabbed a large KFC fries you may be berating yourself for ‘being bad’.
In reality that season coffee comes in at around 422 cals, and the pumpkin loaf is 360 cals per slice. That’s a total of 782 cals. In comparison a large KFC portion of fries is a mere 345 cals! Whilst there’s absolutely nothing wrong with spending nearly 800 cals on coffee and a snack you may find that if you’re trying to watch your calories that you can’t accommodate that many cals for a snack. In addition if you don’t realise how many cals they are you are likely to go over calorie budget that day.
Knowledge is power so being aware of the calorie content of things, and also of our own perceptions of the things we consume is always a good thing. If you want the seasonal drink and snack – have it and enjoy it. If you want to some large fries then go for it. Just be aware of the calories so you’re making an educated choice!
It’s quite common to see things described as fat burning. Sometimes it’s in reference to specific diets, modes of eating or certain types of exercise. Low carb diets are often promoted as fat burning on the premise that because there are fewer carbs to burn for energy, fat burning will increase. The same rationale is used by those promoting working out before eating (rather than after) or fasting for periods of time.
You’ll find certain types of workout described as fat burning or you may find your activity monitor describes your workout in terms of the percentage of time in the ‘fat burning’ zone. The argument is that the body burns a greater percentage of fat with lower-intensity exercises than higher intensities because the body doesn’t require ‘fast energy’ from glycogen. As such, this theory promotes longer and lower-intensity workouts that maintain your heart rate within the ‘fat burning zone’. However, while the body does burn fat during low-intensity workouts, the rate remains low and you have to exercise longer to burn the same amount of calories you would at higher intensities.
The main issue is that burning fat is often confused with losing body fat. Fat burning or oxidation refers to the use of fat as a fuel source by the body. This doesn’t equal body fat loss. Eating low carb (and therefore high fat) does mean you’ll burn more fat as fuel because there is more of that available to use. But if you need 1800 cals a day and are eating 2000 cals then you have an additional 200 cals of fat. This won’t increase your fat burning. In a calorie surplus more fat is available in the bloodstream due to a higher intake, so the rate of fat storage is also greater. Research shows that whilst low-carb diets increase fat oxidation, they don’t actually result in
superior fat loss in comparison to higher-carb diets when calories are matched.
This same concept applies to ‘fat burning workouts’ or fasted cardio vs fed cardio. Yes fasted cardio BURNS more fat in the session (because fewer carbs/glycogen are available) but if total calorie intake for the day is in surplus to your needs then you won’t lose body fat.
“Fat burning’ and “fat loss” are not
interchangeable concepts.The biggest priority for fat loss is a calorie deficit. If eating fewer carbs, or eating after your workout etc help you to maintain a calorie deficit and therefore make weight loss easier then fab! But going low carb / fasted workouts / fat burning workouts will not inherently be better for fat loss when calories are matched. The overall goal is to find a sustainable way for you to consistently achieve a calorie deficit.
Every Step Fitness 