Tag: healthy foods

Tuesday Tip: Post dinner cravings 🍫🍟🍦

We’ve all been there, you’ve had a balanced, filling meal, you’re not hungry and yet, chocolate, crisps, or ice cream start calling your name.

Post dinner cravings aren’t just about hunger. They’re a mix of psychology, biology, and environment and understanding that makes them more manageable.

High sugar, high fat foods stimulate the brain’s dopamine system. They trigger reward pathways that make you want more, even when your body doesn’t need extra fuel. Stress and emotions also have an impact. Food is a quick comfort, so cravings increase when you’re tired, overwhelmed, or anxious.

The other important factor is restriction. Studies consistently find that strict ‘no treats’ rules backfire. In fact, studies show that people who practice flexible eating (allowing treats in moderation) report fewer and less intense cravings than those who follow rigid diets.

So how can you prevent and manage these cravings?

⁃ Stop demonising foods. Labelling foods ‘bad’ often makes them more tempting. Instead, allow higher calorie foods in moderation and enjoy them mindfully.

⁃ Pair ‘junk’ food with foods higher in nutrients (protein, fibre, vitamins etc) e.g. strawberries, Greek yogurt, and some chocolate

⁃ Plan ahead – having balanced, high-protein meals and snacks on hand makes it easier to resist impulsive choices.

⁃ Thirst is often mistaken for hunger, so start with a glass of water before reaching for the snack cupboard.

Remember cravings don’t mean you’ve failed or lost control. They’re simply normal signal. And with the right strategy, you can acknowledge them without derailing your progress.

So next time the ice cream tub calls your name after dinner, pause. Ask yourself: is this hunger, emotion, or just habit? Then decide mindfully.

Happy Tuesday 🤗xx

Tuesday Tip: Tracking calories, not losing weight? 🔍

If you’re tracking your calories and not losing weight, you’re not tracking accurately. I know you may think you are, and I’m not suggesting you’re consciously under tracking but the reality it’s hard to be totally accurate.

Research shows that even the most careful trackers often underestimate their intake, and the gap is bigger than most people realize. If you’re

1,500 calories a day, studies suggest in reality, you may be consuming closer to 1,700 calories if you’re very accurate, and closer to 2,000 (or more) if you’re not. That’s hundreds of calories each day slipping through unnoticed.

In one study, adults underreported their daily calories by as much as 700 calories. That’s the equivalent of a burger and fries missing from their food diary. Even more telling, when participants were offered a financial incentive for accuracy, they still couldn’t reliably track what they ate. So this isn’t about dishonesty; it’s about the inherent difficulty of calorie tracking.

Think about it: portion sizes are hard to estimate, labels can be misleading, restaurant meals hide oils and dressings, and a quick handful of snacks often goes uncounted. Even small mistakes add up quickly. That spoonful of peanut butter you logged? If it’s actually two, you’ve just underestimated by nearly over 100 calories. Repeat that a few times a day, and it’s easy to see how the numbers add up.

So what does this mean? Is tracking pointless then? No but you have to be really honest with yourself and be open to the fact that you’re probably not tracking perfectly- no one is. So if you’re not losing weight it doesn’t necessarily mean your body is broken or your metabolism is damaged. It likely means your intake is a little higher than you think, and that’s normal. You either need to double down on the tracking and check you’re being as accurate as possible or lower your calorie goal. Track as best you can, stay mindful of hidden calories, and adjust based on results over time.

Happy Tuesday 🤗
Xx

Tuesday Tip: Strength Training and Brain Health 🧠

We often think of crosswords, Sudoku, or ‘brain training’ apps as the best way to protect our memory as we age. But recent research suggests strength training may do more for your brain than any puzzle ever could. In a 6-month study of older adults with mild cognitive impairment (a group at high risk for dementia) participants were assigned to one of four groups: resistance training, cognitive training, both, or a control group of nothing. Resistance training alone came produced the best results.

It was a simple strength training program of lifting at around 80% of their maximum strength, 3 sets of 8 reps, 2–3 times per week, focusing on major muscle groups. After six months, those who got stronger also got sharper. Improvements were seen in memory, executive function, processing speed, and attention. MRI scans even showed growth in the posterior cingulate cortex, a brain region tied to memory and one of the first hit by Alzheimer’s. The stronger participants became, the more this area grew. Interestingly adding cognitive training to resistance training actually reduced the benefits. Strength training alone not only improved cognition but maintained those gains for at least 18 months after the study ended, without continued exercise. Brain atrophy slowed, connectivity improved, and memory held steady.

Why? Building strength boosts brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), blood flow, and growth factors in both muscle and brain. In short, your muscles talk to your brain. So if you want to protect your mind, train your body. Two to three full-body sessions a week, working hard enough to challenge yourself, may be one of the simplest, most powerful ways to keep your brain resilient. Forget just training your brain, train your muscles. Your mind will thank you.

Happy Tuesday 🤗

Xx